The last nine months has seen a new wave of repression in Saudi Arabia as the authorities have cracked down on protesters and reformists, Amnesty International said today as it published a new report on the issue.In Saudi Arabia: Repression in the Name of Security, the organisation says hundreds of people have been arrested for demonstrating, while the government has drafted an anti-terror law that would effectively criminalise dissent as a “terrorist crimeâ€ and further strip away rights from those accused of such offences.
Amnesty said that since February, when sporadic demonstrations began – in defiance of a permanent national ban on protests – the government has carried out a crackdown that has included the arrest of hundreds of mostly Shiâ€™a Muslims in the restive Eastern Province. Since March over 300 people who took part in peaceful protests in al-Qatif, al-Ahsa and Awwamiya have been detained, either at demonstrations or shortly afterwards. Most have been released, often after pledging not to protest again. Many face travel bans.
Elsewhere in the country, protests have been stifled by warnings from the Interior Ministry that the authorities would â€œtake all necessary measuresâ€ against those who tried to â€œdisrupt orderâ€. Those individuals who have demonstrated have been swiftly arrested.
Among them was 40-year-old Khaled al-Johani, the only man to demonstrate on the 11 March â€œDay of Rageâ€ in Riyadh, who told journalists he was frustrated by media censorship in Saudi Arabia and predicted his own arrest. Charged with supporting a protest and communicating with foreign media, he is believed to have been held in solitary confinement for two months. Nine months on, he remains in detention and has not been tried.
A number of people who have spoken up in support of protests or reform have been arrested. Sheikh Tawfiq Jaber Ibrahim al-â€˜Amr, a Shi’a cleric, was arrested for the second time this year in August for calling for reform at a mosque. He has been charged with â€œinciting public opinionâ€.
On 22 November, 16 men, including nine prominent reformists, were given sentences by the Specialised Criminal Court ranging from five to 30 years in prison, on charges that included forming a secret organisation, attempting to seize power, incitement against the King, financing terrorism, and money laundering. Amnesty said that their trial, which began in May, was grossly unfair. The defendants were blindfolded and handcuffed during the trial while their lawyer was not allowed to enter the court for the first three sessions.
Amnesty International interim Middle East and North Africa Director Philip Luther said:
â€œPeaceful protesters and supporters of political reform in the country have been targeted for arrest in an attempt to stamp out the kinds of call for reform that have echoed across the region.
While the arguments used to justify this wide-ranging crackdown may be different, the abusive practices being employed by the Saudi Arabian government are worryingly similar to those which they have long used against people accused of terrorist offences.â€
In April, an Interior Ministry spokesperson said that around 5,000 people connected to the â€œdeviant groupâ€, meaning al-Qaâ€™ida, had been questioned and referred for trials. Amnesty said that the government continues to detain thousands of people, many of them without charge or trial, on terrorism-related grounds. Torture and other ill-treatment in detention remains rife.
In July Amnesty published a leaked copy of a secret draft anti-terror law, which would allow the Saudi Arabian authorities to prosecute peaceful dissent as a terrorist crime and permit extended detention without charge or trial. After Amnesty published the draft law, the Saudi Arabian authorities appeared to briefly block access to the organisationâ€™s website from within the Kingdom and said that its concerns about the law were â€œbaseless, mere supposition and without foundationâ€.
If the law were to be passed without amendment, terrorist crimes would include â€œendangeringâ€¦ national unityâ€ and â€œharming the reputation of the state or its positionâ€. Questioning the integrity of the King would carry a minimum prison sentence of ten years.
Philip Luther added:
â€œUnless it is radically altered, the proposed draft anti-terror law would make the current situation even worse, as it would entrench and make legal the very worst practices we have documented.
â€œThe Saudi Arabian government absolutely has a responsibility to protect the public from violent attacks, but that has to be done within the boundaries of international law.â€